Draven
Pioneer
I believe it is illegal to use magic items as reps for later-created armor reps, I.E. making a rad leather bracer into a magic non-armor item, and then deciding later to use it in a 20 pt suit of armor -unless the item’s rituals also convert over to that suit of armor-.
Here’s why:
John has a leather bracer with 2/LP Recharge Prowess, which is then included in their suit of armor as an applicable rep. The armor tag is then enchanted with 20 rituals, including an item recall.
If this is legal, the leather bracer is now the beneficiary of the item recall. The armor suit is now the beneficiary of 23 rituals because of that.
As this is absolutely not an intention of the system, I believe it is thus illegal, unless rituals on the reps count toward the armor suit. However, since a suit of armor does not “distribute” rituals to its reps, I would believe the converse to also be true; the suit of armor cannot receive rituals from individual reps.
Therefore, I believe the system must work by disallowing magic items as reps for a suit of armor. Can you confirm if this is true?
Here’s why:
John has a leather bracer with 2/LP Recharge Prowess, which is then included in their suit of armor as an applicable rep. The armor tag is then enchanted with 20 rituals, including an item recall.
If this is legal, the leather bracer is now the beneficiary of the item recall. The armor suit is now the beneficiary of 23 rituals because of that.
As this is absolutely not an intention of the system, I believe it is thus illegal, unless rituals on the reps count toward the armor suit. However, since a suit of armor does not “distribute” rituals to its reps, I would believe the converse to also be true; the suit of armor cannot receive rituals from individual reps.
Therefore, I believe the system must work by disallowing magic items as reps for a suit of armor. Can you confirm if this is true?